The academic review process is designed to ensure the quality and continuous improvement of 91黑料网鈥檚 academic programs and units. It is designed to be flexible, accountable, and responsive to the needs of the 91黑料网 community.

Reviews are carried out in accordance with policies of the (BCI) and international best practices. The process is overseen by the Office of Academic Reviews and governed by 91黑料网鈥檚 Regulations on Academic Reviews.

The review process

  • Each year, Deans collaborate with the OAR to decide which programs or units will be reviewed.
  • Timelines vary depending on type and needs, but a full review must be conducted at least every 10 years.
  • A Review Committee is established for each review, reporting to the Provost and Executive Vice-President (Academic).

Components of the review process include:

  • A Self-Study Report (confidential) prepared by the unit/program under review
  • A Review Committee Report (confidential) which outlines recommendations arising out of the review.
  • A Faculty Action Plan (publicly available) documenting the Faculty鈥檚 assessment of the Review Committee Report and plans to address the committee鈥檚 recommendations.
  • Following their review, Faculties will be asked to provide regular progress reports to the Academic Policy Committee to report on the implementation of their action plan. 

Read the full Procedures on Academic Reviews.

Review criteria

The following criteria are outlined by the :

  1. Clarity and coherence of program learning outcomes and their suitability for the level of study.
  2. Adequacy of the admission requirements relative to the program learning outcomes.
  3. Appropriateness of the program structure in relation to the program learning outcomes.
  4. Coherence between the curriculum and the expected program learning outcomes.
  5. Appropriateness of teaching and learning assessment strategies in relation to program learning outcomes.
  6. Measures to support student success tailored to the needs and diversity of student population.
  7. Adequacy of faculty expertise and other human resources required to deliver quality programs.
  8. Adequacy of material, informational, and digital resources in relation to program outcomes.
  9. Maintaining the relevance of the program, including: academic or artistic, societal, and system. 

Reviews at 91黑料网

Faculty Response and Action Plans for past reviews conducted at 91黑料网 are available to the public. Search for reviews by Faculty / School. 

Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
Faculty of Arts
School of Continuing Studies
Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences
Faculty of Education

 

Faculty of Engineering
Faculty of Law
Desautels Faculty of Management
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Schulich School of Music
Faculty of Science

Office of Academic Reviews

The Office of Academic Reviews is responsible for overseeing and administering the academic review process in collaboration with academic unit heads. 

if you have any questions about the process or an upcoming review.