As geopolitical tensions redraw the rules of global commerce, the traditional lawyer is becoming an endangered species, forcing a radical rethink of how we prepare the next generation of legal minds.
Why Now Is the Time to Reconsider
As the Trump 2.0 era tariffs and trade sanctions sweep across global economies, we鈥檙e witnessing a sharp surge in demand for . The return of trade sanctions and geopolitical brinkmanship means legal officers now must serve not only as legal advisers but also as and . Compliance, cross-border disputes, and trade law crises have become central to boardroom strategy, demanding that lawyers evolve into geopolitically fluent advisors.
Against this backdrop, legal education stands at a pivotal crossroads. Today鈥檚 legal environment is more complex than ever: the global crises unfolding since the pandemic have amplified the need for expertise. Meanwhile, law schools have long favored a broad 鈥溾�� legal doctrine education, producing generalists. Yet today鈥檚 market demands with competitive advantages in trade law, regulatory forecasting, and global risk mitigation. With these dynamics in mind, the long鈥憇tanding divide between legal education and business training resurfaces as a pressing issue.
Many universities have already begun pursuing , prompted by several financial pressures: the decline in the number of international students; limits on research funding; greater tuition discounting; and the erosion of endowment values due to volatile stock markets. Nearly of university leaders have discussed merging in response to structural deficits; at the same time, the rate of closures has climbed to approximately in 2024. These moves are seen as strategic responses to rising costs and demographic shifts, enabling economies of scale while ensuring mission continuity. Such structural changes open up space for new collaborative models that actively dissolve academic silos and integrate law & business programming into unified platforms.
It鈥檚 time to rethink this separation. It is helpful in that respect to take a closer look at how universities are leading the charge by engaging in transformative curriculum redesign to embed environmental, technological and governance issues, along with a dedicated turn to hands-on legal instruction to prepare students for real-world practice. These institutional examples are the more significant as we place them in the context of broader trends in the profession. What shines through is that the integration of legal and business training offers richer, more adaptive preparation for the complex demands of the 21st-century legal landscape.
Voices in Opposition and Support
Historically, law schools and business schools have arguably served different missions, and critics often cite this distinction when opposing their amalgamation. They argue that the two schools differ so significantly in that combining them risks undermining the integrity of legal education. The recent backlash at the University of Auckland highlights from alumni and faculty against forced mergers. Opponents warned that students choose the Law School because it emphasizes public interest, human rights, and social justice. They expressed concern that the merger would from fields such as environmental or Indigenous law and reduce the Law Faculty to a subordinate arm of the Business School.
Proponents often point to well-established dual-degree programs that already bring together the worlds of law and business in their curriculums. For decades, many North American universities have offered JD/MBA programs. For instance, at the University of Pennsylvania, which is jointly administered by the Carey Law School and the Wharton School of Business, immerses students in accelerated curricula. Students earn both the JD and MBA degrees in just , rather than the five years that would typically be required if pursued separately. Similarly, the offered by the Schulich School of Business and Osgoode Hall Law School at York University in Toronto is designed to be completed in four years, as is the four-year jointly run by Cornell Law School and the Johnson College of Business at Cornell University. These programs illustrate a broader shift: lawyers are now regularly collaborating across disciplines to deliver 鈥溾�� for complex challenges that transcend traditional legal boundaries. Such problems demand both 鈥溾�� and expertise in coordinating across diverse jurisdictions and business sectors.
How Mergers Benefit the Next Generation of Legal Professionals
Turn Sustainability Theory into Practice
Customers and investors expect companies to and respect human rights. Graduates from combined law and business programs can translate sustainability theory into actionable strategies across complex, real-world contexts. Maastricht University provides a compelling example of this concept at play. Within its 2025 curriculum, the in Maastricht, the Netherlands, offers the 鈥溾�� master鈥檚 program, in which students engage deeply with , covering issues such as natural resource depletion and the legal realization of the right to development. These aspiring lawyers supplement theoretical knowledge with hands-on sustainability assessment skills, gaining proficiency in scenario analysis and multi-criteria evaluation. They emerge capable of critically assessing regulatory frameworks and validating the real-world impact of sustainability initiatives through a legal lens.
Conversely, students at can enroll in the 鈥溾�� program (specializing in Business for Sustainability). Here, courses like and modules on global environmental law blend legal frameworks with entrepreneurial thinking. Students learn to innovate in sustainability-driven business models while also situating them within existing international legal structures. This approach ensures that emerging sustainable businesses are not only creative but also compliant and resilient within evolving regulatory landscapes.
If Maastricht鈥檚 Faculty of Law in the Netherlands were merged with its School of Business and Economics, it could more effectively cultivate professionals with interdisciplinary competencies. Such integration allows students to master European environmental law within a unified curriculum while simultaneously developing expertise in sustainability assessment and innovative business strategies. This approach ensures that every graduate gains compound training, equipping them to use legal frameworks as strategic tools to safeguard sustainable business practices. Rooted in , learners become proactive in designing sustainability strategies that are not only legally sound and commercially viable but also scalable and defensible in practice. By integrating both fields, the program empowers future leaders to treat law not as a constraint, but as a foundational enabler of .
Advancing Social Sciences Through Technological Innovation
In a fast鈥慹volving legal field, technology is no longer an optional tool but an for lawyers. In China, where the AI industry is advancing rapidly, technology universities are embedding technical training into social science education to cultivate the next generation鈥檚 technological competence. In 2022, at the dawn of generative AI, the in Wuhan immediately organized the , signaling an early commitment to integrating technology with legal studies. Building on this momentum, starting from the 2023 academic year, the school introduced courses such as Digital Law and AI Law. Drawing on the university鈥檚 strong computer science disciplines, law students explore in depth how emerging technologies shape legal frameworks by examining topics ranging from data privacy concerns to algorithmic accountability. This grounding in technology equips future lawyers with the knowledge to interpret and apply regulations governing AI deployment, making them invaluable in a world where law increasingly contends with digital innovation.
Meanwhile, HUST鈥檚 in Wuhan has launched a program that integrates core economic theory with AI and digital tools. Business students are encouraged not only to understand market forces but also to grasp the technological dimensions of digital transformation. By learning economic modeling in tandem with the scientific principles that underpin digital systems and AI, they graduate ready to craft sustainable strategies that evolve in harmony with ongoing developments in technology. Training involves anticipating technical interoperability challenges so that their innovations are both economically viable and technologically coherent.
Legal education can no longer rely on siloed, discipline-bound models if it aims to prepare lawyers for the realities of a rapidly digitizing economy, and must instead embrace to equip students with the blended legal, business, and technological competencies that modern practice demands. If the School of Law and the School of Economics at HUST were to merge, the resulting integrated educational model would create an extraordinary alchemical blend of legal, economic, and technological expertise. In this unified environment, students would receive precise training in hands-on experimentation, critical analysis of AI鈥檚 impact and , allowing them not only to craft innovative strategies in the digital economy but also to understand the legal architectures governing them. This holistic model would prepare graduates to operate at the nexus of business innovation and legal oversight, able to design digital solutions grounded in both economic logic and legal rigor.
Accelerating Impact Through Rigorous, Integrated Training
Government officials and policymakers are showing in research that assesses how laws and regulations function in practice. For lawyers and scholars, understanding the interplay between has become imperative. In New York, exemplifies this principle. Designed for exceptionally driven students, it condenses both rigorous legal and business curricula into just three years, enabling graduates to enter the workforce an entire year earlier than those in traditional dual-degree tracks. This acceleration does more than just save time; it fosters an environment in which future professionals are trained to think fluidly across disciplinary boundaries under real-world pressure.
Within this program, students receive a in law and business theory, policy, and practice in their first two years, then leverage elective courses and empirical legal studies to hone specialized knowledge. The emphasis on empirical scholarship, analyzing social impact using data-driven methods, imbues graduates with the ability to assess not just how laws function, but also how they transform societies and markets. Several electives are co-taught by Columbia Law and Business faculty, promoting a collaborative mindset essential for tackling complex challenges like regulatory innovation and financial compliance.
The program is also closely integrated with the , a joint initiative of Columbia Law School and Columbia Business School that connects students with leading scholars, policymakers, and industry practitioners. Through its , the center enables students to deepen their understanding of how legal and business strategies shape policy and corporate decision-making. The result is a new generation of leaders who are not just multi-disciplinary but deeply integrated thinkers capable of drafting legally sound business models, anticipating regulatory shifts, and mobilizing empirical evidence to inform both courtroom arguments and boardroom decisions, all while entering their careers faster and with sharper tools.
Cultivating 鈥淭hird-Space鈥� Professionals
The concept of a , drawn from intercultural and educational theory, refers to spaces where individuals negotiate multiple identities, transcending contextually narrow professional norms. in Barcelona, Spain, exemplifies this transformative approach through initiatives like the bachelor鈥檚 program. During , she deliberately shunned the binary identities of either a 鈥渂usiness student鈥� or a 鈥渓aw student.鈥� By engaging with economics, law, politics, and international relations, she forged a new professional identity as a 鈥淕lobal Governance Practitioner鈥�, a role that exists squarely within this third space.
At ESADE, quantitative coursework in economics merges with rigorous legal training and public-policy engagement, enabling students to continuously adapt to shifting contexts. This broadens the students鈥� analytical toolbox and encourages them to position themselves fluidly across sectors. Justine鈥檚 story illustrates this beautifully: through GGEL, she wasn鈥檛 siloed into predefined disciplinary identities. Instead, she integrated multiple fields to become a global problem-solver, someone equally at ease analyzing macroeconomic trends, interpreting international law, or engaging with diplomats in an NGO setting. Her emerging identity reflects a deliberate , symbolizing a future labor market that prizes adaptive, boundary-spanning professionals.
By nurturing such third-space identities, ESSADE (sic) helps produce graduates equipped for global careers in diplomacy, sustainable development, and multinational governance arenas that demand fluency in both legal reasoning and business strategy. This capacity to 鈥渓ive鈥� in the space between disciplines is precisely what makes an integrated law-business education not just academically rich, but socially and globally relevant.
Mapping a Path Ahead
Looking ahead, law and business education can move toward deeper integration through transitional models that start small and build gradually. Institutions can begin breaking down disciplinary silos by embedding business strategy and technological literacy into legal curricula through , rather than hastily dismantling existing structures. Initial efforts can start with small-scale collaborative initiatives, such as shared foundational training years, followed by like university-industry partnerships and international exchanges, where students tackle complex, real-world problems. For programs that are truly moving toward fully institutional integration, careful of the merger is essential, and faculty and alumni should be engaged early to cultivate the boundary-spanning professional culture necessary to sustain long-term collaboration.
Ultimately, the question is not whether law and business schools should merge but how they might do so in ways that enrich student experience, enhance institutional resilience, and respond to a shifting professional landscape. The current confluence of financial pressure, curricular convergence, and demand for cross-disciplinary thinkers presents a rare opportunity. If we act thoughtfully, the result could be educational models that better prepare graduates for 21st-century challenges without sacrificing the strengths that define each discipline.
Acknowledgements
I am deeply grateful to Professor Peer Zumbansen, Professor of Business Law at 91黑料网, for his continuous guidance and detailed feedback throughout the development of this blog. I would also like to extend my heartfelt thanks to fellow STL students Julia鈥疪odrigues and Ruohan鈥疿u for their invaluable efforts in鈥痳esearching information and contributing content throughout the blog-writing process.
Bibliography
- Karen Sloan, Trade war boosted law firm demand in early 2025 but challenges lie ahead, report says, Reuters.Com (May 5, 2025), .
- Jonathan Galaviz and Sally Alghazali, Lawyers must now be geopolitical analysts, Reuters.Com (Mar. 5, 2025), .
- Simona Sopova, Modern General Counsel: Evolving to Business Strategist, GAIA 2025 Guide (Apr. 23, 2025), .
- Sphere of Law, Understanding Negotiation and Dispute Resolution in Legal Practice, My Blog (June 13, 2024), .
- Richard Susskind, Reimagining Legal Education, Harvard Law School Center on the Legal Profession (Sept. 14, 2025), .
- Jen Dezso, Insights in Action: Supercharging demand 鈥� a case study in differentiation, Reuters.Com (May 23, 2025), .
- Neil Lefkowitz, How Mergers and Acquisitions Are Reshaping Higher Education, Loeb (June, 2025), .
- 2024 Survey of College and University Presidents, Inside Higher Ed (Feb. 27, 2024), .
- Jordan Rothman, Business School And Law School Should Not Be Compared, Above the Law (May 15, 2024), .
- Chris Goode, The University of Auckland鈥檚 Proposal to Merge the Faculties of Law and Business & Economics, (May 19, 2025), .
- Kyle Church, A Concerning Merger of the University of Auckland Law and Business Faculties 鈥� 1/200, 1/200 (Jan. 14, 2025), .
- Francis J. & Wm. Polk Carey JD/MBA Program, MBA Program (Mar. 2, 2019), .
- Carey JD/MBA Program, PennCareyLaw JD/MBA (May 14, 2024), .
- Josh Lee, An Interview with Professor David B. Wilkins, Lester Kissel Professor of Law, Vice Dean for Global Initiatives on the Legal Profession, Faculty Director of the Center on the Legal Profession, Harvard Law School, LawTech.Asia (Aug. 19, 2023), .
- Polly Thompson, KPMG鈥檚 legal boss says there鈥檚 one area where the Big Four can have an edge over Big Law, Business Insider (Mar. 31, 2025), .
- Anna Kuusniemi-Laine, What Does Sustainability Mean to a Corporate Lawyer?, Castrn & Snellman (Sept. 24, 2020), .
- European Law School: Law for a Sustainable Europe, Maastricht University .
- European Environmental Law, Maastricht University Faculty of Law, .
- Sustainability Science, Policy and Society, Maastricht University .
- Sustainability Science, Policy and Society Specialisations, Maastricht University .
- Allen Rodriguez, Essential Technology Skills for Modern Lawyers, ONE400 (Apr. 22, 2024), .
- School Introduction, HUST Law School, .
- The 2022 International Symposium on 鈥淎rtificial Intelligence and Judicial Big Data鈥� Successfully Held, HUST Law School (Sept. 25, 2022), .
- Official Announcement: Huazhong University of Science and Technology鈥檚 鈥淒igital Economy + AI Dual Bachelor鈥檚 Degree Program鈥� Approved for Cultivating Interdisciplinary Talent, HUST School of Economics (May 21, 2024), .
- Taylor J. Scott et. al, Bridging the Research-Policy Divide: Pathways to Engagement and Skill Development, PMC, .
- Alysia Blackham, Empirical teaching in law: Building an empirical legal revolution, SLSA Blog (June 27, 2024), .
- Three-Year J.D./MBA Program, Columbia Law School .
- Three-Year J.D./MBA Academics Courses, Columbia Law School .
- Three-Year JD/MBA, Columbia Business School, .
- Chantal Crozet et al., Striving for the third place. Intercultural competence: From language policy to language education, Research Gate, .
- Esade, ESADE | Business & Law School in Barcelona & Madrid, .
- Bachelor in Global Governance, Economics & Legal Order, ESADE, .
- Adam, Interview with Justine, Bachelor in Global Governance, Economics and Legal Order at ESADE, Yourdreamschool.Com (Aug. 7, 2024), .
- Celia Whitchurch, From 鈥榳orking in third space鈥� to 鈥榯hird space professionals鈥�, Third Space Perspectives - Exploring Integrated Pr (Sept. 22, 2022), .